Categories
Business Practice This Week in China

Strategic and Economic Debacle

Team Obama faces the 18-month wall for new China hires

Team Obama was just in town for S&ED 2010, and they did a great job underscoring all the new dangers and pitfalls that managers in post-crash China now face. Most initial management teams don’t survive their first 18 months here, and it looks like Tim Geithner’s China career is shot through with more than a few holes. But Team O’s difficulties in China go further than personnel or execution issues. There’s been a problem with goals and with basic strategy.

Obama is not shaping up to be the Manager-in-Chief for the China set. True, he’s been dealt a lousy hand, but the US administration has made mistake after mistake here. Here are the top five:
 
1. Looked for the easy win-win.

• Team O took the high road, as so many China neophytes have tried in the past, and just got lost in the woods. The Chinese side sold them the usual bill of goods about the importance of Face and Guanxi, and Geithner bought it all. He ended up trading real concessions for photo-ops.
• Team O made a number of Bad Compromises – where they were arguing about how to best enact a bad decision. (Example: Deciding to delay a declaration on forex manipulation until the G20, and then compromising again BEFORE the G20 to make forex China’s own call.) This tactic has done in a lot of new China managers.

Rule: Never count on unspoken tit-for-tat concessions

2. Let them set the agenda
• They allowed China to define the terms before the meets. "We help the world most by helping China to stay strong" has become Beijing doctrine. The US has to fight that or get used to it. Global solutions probably won’t work without China, so it may be time to stop trying.

Rule: Don’t give power without extracting commitments.

3. Told them when we were going home

• The US side has been too obvious about its intentions and too clear about its timetable. Never give a Chinese counterparty the date and time of your next meeting. Never tell them when you are flying home. Chinese are natural passive-aggressive avoiders who feel they can endure anything. Congress threatened China on currency and nothing happened. Now China waits out the US every time.

Rule: Never threaten if you won’t pull the trigger.

4. Couldn’t describe a "yes" in details

• The Chinese side always knew what a "yes" looked like. They were prepared with a wide range of variables, options and scenarios.
• The US only seemed to want to preserve the pre-crash world order – without ever being able to argue why that was a good thing.

Rule: Know your own goals and then analyze the other side’s.

5. Gave up exclusivity too early

• They made China the star of their drama before getting it onboard.
• The US assumes that it is still writing the script and that we are all in this together. China isn’t in this with the US. Why are the US negotiators the only ones who haven’t figured this out?

Rule: Always have a Plan B that you can go to early.

Hopefully, S&ED 2010 signals a shift to a new relationship between the US and China based on a stronger, more competent team – and a clearer, more realistic agenda for the US side.

Andrew Hupert is an adjunct professor at New York University in Shanghai and publisher of ChinaSolved and ChineseNegotiation.com.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from China Economic Review

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading